Systematic literature review and expert meeting report on health-related quality of life in chronic venous disease.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic venous disease (CVD) can lead to considerable morbidity and impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this review was twofold: (i) to provide a deeper understanding of how CVD affects HRQoL (physical, psychological and social functioning), and (ii) to review the impact of evidence-based veno-active drugs (VADs) on HRQoL. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: For the effect of CVD on HRQoL, information was gathered during an Expert Consensus Meeting, during which data were presented from both the patient and physician perspective assessed with validated quality-of-life measures. For the impact of VADs on HRQoL, a systematic literature review was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic databases were searched for real world evidence or randomized-controlled trials (RCT) vs. placebo, reporting data on the influence of VADs on HRQoL in patients with CVD. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: CVD can negatively affect daily life in a number of areas related to pain, physical function and social activities. The impact of CVD on HRQoL begins early in the disease and for patients the emotional burden of the disease is as high as the physical burden. In contrast, physicians tend to overestimate the physical impact. The database search yielded 184 unique records, of which 19 studies reporting on VADs and HRQoL in patients with CVD met the inclusion criteria (13 observational and 6 RCTs). Micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF) was the most represented agent, associated with 12/19 studies (2 RCTs and 10 observational). Of the 6 RCTs, only MPFF, aminaphthone and low-dose diosmin provided statistically significant evidence for improvement on HRQoL compared with placebo; for the other VADs improvements in HRQoL were not statistically different from placebo. MPFF was also associated with improvements in HRQoL in the observational studies, across all CEAP clinical classes, as monotherapy or in combination with other conservative therapy, and for all aspects of HRQoL: physical, psychological, and social. Real-world data for the other VADs were scarce. Ruscus extract, sulodexide and a semi-synthetic diosmin were each represented by a single observational study and these limited data were associated with statistically significant improvements compared with baseline in overall and subdomain scores across the range of CEAP clinical classes. CONCLUSIONS: CVD can impair patients' HRQoL significantly at all stages of the disease. MPFF has the greatest evidence base of clinical use in both RCT and real-world observational studies for effectiveness on HRQoL and is recognized by international guidelines. The complete video presentation of the work is available online at www.minervamedica.it (Supplementary Digital Material 1: Supplementary Video 1, 5 min, 194 MB).

Use of Intralesional and Perilesional Human Recombinant Epidermal Growth Factor (hrEGF) in the Local Treatment of Venous Ulcer - Review Article - Expert Recommendation.

Venous Ulcers (VU) represent 60-80% of all leg ulcers and are the final stage of the disease secondary to venous hypertension or valve insufficiency. Conventional treatment that focuses on its etiological factors continues to be the gold standard; however, 30% of ulcers do not heal with this treatment; thus, it has been seen that the use of growth factor can be used as an adjuvant for this pathology. A literature review was carried out to evaluate the evidence from systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case studies, and quantitative studies that respond to the objective of this analysis review in the different databases with specific inclusion criteria with publications between 2002 and 2022, initially finding the topical application of the factor and later, more recently, the intralesional and perilesional application, the latter being an alternative treatment for this type of pathology and generating some recommendations for using the Factor.

VEIN STEP: A Prospective, Observational, International Study to Assess Effectiveness of Conservative Treatments in Chronic Venous Disease.

INTRODUCTION: VEIN STEP was conducted to collect international data on the management of chronic venous disease (CVD) and to assess the effectiveness of conservative treatments for the relief of CVD signs and symptoms. METHODS: This international, observational, prospective, longitudinal, cohort study recruited adult outpatients consulting for symptomatic CVD. The primary objective was the effectiveness of conservative treatments on symptoms, signs and quality of life in a real-life setting assessed using a range of patient-reported outcome measures: 10-cm Visual Analog and Patient Global Impression of Change scales for symptoms; Venous Clinical Severity Score for physician assessment of signs; and 14-item ChronIc Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ-14) for quality of life. At inclusion, patients were prescribed conservative treatment according to the physicians' usual practice. Follow-up visits took place at weeks 2 and 4, with an optional week 8 visit. RESULTS: The analysis set comprised 6084 subjects (78% female) from nine countries with a mean age of 50.6 ± 13.8 years and BMI of 28.0 ± 4.9 kg/m2. The most common CEAP classifications were C1 (23.0%), C2 (31.6%), and C3 (30.7%). Conservative therapy consisted of oral venoactive drugs (VADs; 95.8% of subjects) including micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF 75.5%) and diosmin (18.8%), compression (52.0%), and topicals (31.5%). Conservative therapy led to global symptom improvement in 89% of patients after 2 weeks and 96% at 4 weeks. Pain, leg heaviness, cramps, and sensation of swelling were improved in 82%, 71%, 45.5%, and 46% of patients, respectively. Conservative therapy was associated with a decrease over time in patient-assessed global symptom intensity: - 2.37 ± 1.73 (P < 0.001) and physician-assessed disease severity - 1.83 ± 2.82 (P < 0.001). Among the VADs, MPFF-based conservative therapy was associated with the greatest reduction in symptom and sign intensity. Improvements in CIVIQ-14 were observed with all treatments but were greatest for MPFF. CONCLUSION: In this prospective study conducted in the real-world setting, treatment with conservative therapy, in particular MPFF, was associated with meaningful improvements in the clinical signs and symptoms of disease as well as in quality of life in patients with CVD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04574375.

STUDY AIM: The VEIN STEP study aimed to gather global data on managing chronic venous disease (CVD) and evaluate the usefulness of conservative (non-surgical) treatments for improving CVD signs and symptoms. METHODS: Persons included in the study group had symptomatic CVD and were visiting outpatient clinics. The main aim was to measure how well treatments improved symptoms, physical signs of the illness, and quality of life. Different methods were used to measure these aspects, such as rating symptoms on a 10-point scale and using questionnaires completed by patients and doctors. STUDY FINDINGS: 6084 participants from nine countries joined the study. They were mostly women (78%) with an average age of around 50. Common symptoms included leg pain and leg heaviness. Treatments consisted mainly of drugs active on vein function, like MPFF and diosmin, along with compression stockings and creams. Conservative treatment led to symptom improvement in 89% of patients after 2 weeks and 96% at 4 weeks. Pain and leg heaviness improved in most patients (82% and 71% over the same period) while cramps, and swelling showed improvement in 45.5% and 46% of patients, respectively. Patients reported a significant decrease in symptom intensity, and doctors observed a reduction in disease severity. MPFF was associated with the highest reduction in symptom intensity. Improvements in quality of life were observed with all treatments but were greatest for MPFF. CONCLUSION: The study highlights that conservative treatments, especially MPFF, are associated with significant improvements in the clinical signs and symptoms of patients with CVD as well as in their quality of life.

Optimising Decision Making in Chronic Venous Disease Management with Micronised Purified Flavonoid Fraction.

Evidence-based medicine favours randomised controlled trials to limit bias and establish the effects of a treatment with statistical rigour. However, the controlled conditions and careful patient selection of randomised trials may produce results that cannot be generalised to a more diverse patient population in clinical practice. Therefore, there is growing recognition of the importance of supplementing randomised trial data with real-world evidence. Micronised purified flavonoid fraction has been investigated in several large-scale real-world studies, including the RELIEF and DECIDE studies, each of which included more than 1000 patients with chronic venous disease. These studies demonstrated a significant reduction in the prevalence and severity of chronic venous disease symptoms, and an improvement in quality of life. The chronic VEnous dIsorders maNagement and treatment effectivenesS evaluaTion in chronic vEnous disease, an international Program (VEINSTEP) study (NCT04574375), is currently underway in more than 6000 patients with chronic venous disease in nine countries. Preliminary data from one country (Morocco) indicate that chronic venous disease drug treatment, which was micronised purified flavonoid fraction in 75.7% of patients, was associated with a statistically significantly reduction in symptoms and improved quality of life. The overall results are awaited with interest. International chronic venous disease guidelines grade the evidence for micronised purified flavonoid fraction highly, as the benefits of micronised purified flavonoid fraction have been proven in randomised clinical trials and meta-analyses. Real-world studies demonstrate that the randomised evidence for micronised purified flavonoid fraction is generalisable to a clinical practice setting. Treatment decisions in chronic venous disease should consider evidence-based recommendations, including real-world data, as well as patient goals of symptom relief, functional improvement and/or better quality of life.

Sclerotherapy of lower limb veins: Indications, contraindications and treatment strategies to prevent complications - A consensus document of the International Union of Phlebology-2023.

BACKGROUND: Sclerotherapy is a non-invasive procedure commonly used to treat superficial venous disease, vascular malformations and other ectatic vascular lesions. While extremely rare, sclerotherapy may be complicated by serious adverse events. OBJECTIVES: To categorise contraindications to sclerotherapy based on the available scientific evidence. METHODS: An international, multi-disciplinary panel of phlebologists reviewed the available scientific evidence and developed consensus where evidence was lacking or limited. RESULTS: Absolute Contraindications to sclerotherapy where the risk of harm would outweigh any benefits include known hypersensitivity to sclerosing agents; acute venous thromboembolism (VTE); severe neurological or cardiac adverse events complicating a previous sclerotherapy treatment; severe acute systemic illness or infection; and critical limb ischaemia. Relative Contraindications to sclerotherapy where the potential benefits of the proposed treatment would outweigh the risk of harm or the risks may be mitigated by other measures include pregnancy, postpartum and breastfeeding; hypercoagulable states with risk of VTE; risk of neurological adverse events; risk of cardiac adverse events and poorly controlled chronic systemic illness. Conditions and circumstances where Warnings and Precautions should be considered before proceeding with sclerotherapy include risk of cutaneous necrosis or cosmetic complications such as pigmentation and telangiectatic matting; intake of medications such as the oral contraceptive and other exogenous oestrogens, disulfiram and minocycline; and psychosocial factors and psychiatric comorbidities that may increase the risk of adverse events or compromise optimal treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Sclerotherapy can achieve safe clinical outcomes provided that (1) patient-related risk factors and in particular all material risks are (1a) adequately identified and the risk benefit ratio is clearly and openly discussed with treatment candidates within a reasonable timeframe prior to the actual procedure; (1b) when an individual is not a suitable candidate for the proposed intervention, conservative treatment options including the option of 'no intervention as a treatment option' are discussed; (1c) complex cases are referred for treatment in controlled and standardised settings and by practitioners with more expertise in the field; (1d) only suitable individuals with no absolute contraindications or those with relative contraindications where the benefits outweigh the risks are offered intervention; (1e) if proceeding with intervention, appropriate prophylactic measures and other risk-mitigating strategies are adopted and appropriate follow-up is organised; and (2) procedure-related risk factors are minimised by ensuring the treating physicians (2a) have adequate training in general phlebology with additional training in duplex ultrasound, procedural phlebology and in particular sclerotherapy; (2b) maintain their knowledge and competency over time and (2c) review and optimise their treatment strategies and techniques on a regular basis to keep up with the ongoing progress in medical technology and contemporary scientific evidence.

Association between cardiac conditions with venous leg ulcers in patients with chronic venous insufficiency.

INTRODUCTION: Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are the final stage of chronic venous insufficiency. This study aims to characterize the association between cardiovascular diseases and VLU. METHODS: A multicentric case-control study analyzed 17,788 patients between 2015 and 2020. Cases were matched (1:2) by age and sex, and odds ratios (OR) were analyzed with conditional logistic regressions adjusted by risk factors. RESULTS: The prevalence of VLU was 15.2%. 2390 cases were analyzed. Diseases found to be associated with VLU were atrial fibrillation (OR, 1.21; 95% CI: 1.03-1.42), pulmonary hypertension (OR, 1.45; 95% CI: 1.06-2.00), right heart failure (OR, 1.27; 95% CI: 1.13-1.43), peripheral artery disease (OR, 2.21; 95% CI: 1.90-2.56), and history of pulmonary embolism (OR, 1.45; 95% CI: 1.06-2.00). CONCLUSIONS: Certain cardiovascular conditions showed an association with VLU. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the effect that treating concomitant cardiovascular diseases might exert on the natural history of venous leg ulcers.

Two-Year Results of a First-In-Human Study in Patients Surgically Implanted With a Bioprosthetic Venous Valve, the VenoValve in Patients With Severe Chronic Venous Insufficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Two-year follow-up results from a first-in-human study of patients implanted with the VenoValve are evaluated for supporting the long-term clinical safety and performance of the device. BACKGROUND: Chronic Venous Insufficiency (CVI) involves improper functioning of lower limb vein valves and inability of these valves to move blood back towards the heart. CVI symptoms include swelling, varicose veins, pain, and leg ulcers. Currently, there is no cure for this condition and treatment options are limited. This study provides 2-year outcomes for 8 patients who were implanted with the bioprosthetic VenoValve for treating severe CVI with deep venous reflux measured at the mid-popliteal vein. The 6-month and 1-year results were previously published. METHODS: Eleven patients with C5 & C6 CVI were implanted with VenoValve into the midthigh femoral vein and followed for 2 years. Assessed clinical outcomes include device-related adverse events, reflux time, disease severity, and pain scores. RESULTS: All 11 implant procedures were successful. Two-year follow-up data was obtained for 8 subjects: 1 patient died of non-device related causes, 1 was lost to follow-up, and 1 refused to follow-up due to the COVID-19 pandemic. No device-related adverse events occurred between the first and second years of follow-up. Reported 2-year clinical performance outcomes included significant decreases in mean reflux times of the mid-popliteal vein (61%), and significant improvements in mean scores for disease severity rVCSS (56%) and VAS pain (87%). CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study support long-term safety and effectiveness of the VenoValve for improving CVI severity by reducing reflux and thereby venous pressures in the lower extremities. With limited treatments for valvular incompetence involved in severe, deep venous CVI, the device may be considered as a novel therapy. A pivotal trial in the United States is currently being conducted to assess the device in a larger number of patients.